Energy Legal Blog

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has upheld FERC’s decision to remove price ceilings on short term (one year or less) capacity releases by shippers on natural gas pipelines, while maintaining price ceilings on capacity sales by the pipelines themselves.  The court’s decision, issued on August 13 in Interstate Natural Gas Assoc. of America v. FERC, rejected arguments from an association of pipelines that FERC had impermissibly subjected pipelines and shippers to different regulatory standards in the same short-term capacity sales market. (more…)

Baltimore Gas & Electric (BG&E) won Maryland PSC approval late Friday for an $833 million smart grid plan pursuant to which it will install 3,000 smart meter devices per day through 2014. Without timely PSC approval, BG&E risked losing approximately $200 million in Department of Energy subsidies to implement the plan.

The PSC rejected BG&E’s original plan, which included the large-scale build-out of advanced meters and mandatory time-of-use (TOU) billing because the PSC opposed (1) granting BG&E a rate tracker to recover smart grid costs as they are incurred as opposed to following a prudence determination, and (2) imposing TOU rates on all retail customers. The PSC also faulted the original BG&E proposal as doing too little to educate customers on how smart grid programs would work. The PSC nevertheless invited BG&E to resubmit its proposal to address these concerns. (more…)

Recently, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission announced a decision under which it will have broader regulatory power over buy-sell transactions on small pipelines. The unexpected decision, stemming from a case involving Arizona Public Service Co. and Sequent Energy Management LP, expands FERC’s prohibition of transactions involving transportation through open access interstate pipelines to apply to intrastate pipelines as well. SNL Financial interviewed Bracewell & Giuliani Partner Mark Lewis about the decision and its potential effects on these common pipeline transactions. Click here to read the article.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) recently determined in a case of first impression that states have limited authority to implement feed-in tariff programs, which generally seek to encourage “green” energy. For energy service companies and energy sellers seeking to take advantage of these programs, the order potentially dampens the prospects for feed-in tariffs to take off in the US, and, at a minimum presents additional FERC compliance considerations, discussed below.

Feed-in tariffs generally consist of three elements: (1) a state-fixed incentive rate designed to attract new sources; (2) a mandated offer to purchase power for a prescribed duration through long-term contract; and (3) a guaranteed access to the grid. (more…)

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on June 17 proposed a rulemaking that, if implemented, has the potential to complete the opening of the transmission grid, an undertaking that began fourteen years ago. Earlier reforms, starting with FERC’s Order No. 888 in 1996, offered for the first time non-discriminatory open access to those who sought to interconnect with and use the grid.  In 2007 Order No. 890 expanded customer participation in the planning and operation of the grid. The new rule proposes to allow all power industry participants to contribute equally to the future design, configuration, and even ownership of the grid.  Public comments on the proposed rulemaking must be submitted to the agency by August, 30, 2010. (more…)

FERC’s Office of Energy Policy and Innovation (OEPI) last week requested comments regarding rate policies, as well as accounting and financial reporting requirements, for new electric-storage technologies such as flywheels and chemical batteries.  OEPI’s goal is to “better understand the various ways electric storage can be used, where each of those uses would fall within established jurisdictional boundaries, and the appropriate rate treatment, accounting classification, and reporting requirements for those uses.”  Comments are due 45 days after the Notice is published in the Federal Register. (more…)